dirtybenny

Without Russia From Love

 

As we await the run up to the pre-production of Bond 25, I thought we could take a look back to a statement made by Michael G. Wilson’s son Greg concerning the direction of the series. The younger Wilson said after the release of SPECTRE:

“We’ve just begun to doodle with ideas for the next movie”, “Each script process begins when we ask ourselves the question ‘what is the world afraid of now?’ In the case of Spectre the theme was global monitoring and utilization of information. So now we are trying to find out what will be relevant in the coming years”.

What junior failed to realize is cinematic Bond has been eschewing fear since the beginning. Cubby Broccoli and Harry Saltzman made a conscious decision to remove the U.S.S.R as Bond’s advisory from the Fleming novels which included them. For example in the novel From Russia with Love, Bond is solely pitted against Russian agents, SPECTRE does not appear anywhere in the story, whereas in the film the Russians are an incidental foe only in that they were also duped by SPECTRE. This is true in every film in which Bond locks horns with a Russian antagonist, they are not representatives of their government but rather rogue agents seeking to sow discontent for their own aggrandizement.

The funny thing is, even in the modern era (of which the youthful Wilson is speaking), shuns fear in the story lines. If they didn’t we’d have had at least one film dealing with Islamic terrorism. Now while government monitoring may be a concern it certainly isn’t a “fear.” You see I, like many, might be concerned with administrative eavesdropping, however, the fact the government knows how often a day I text my wife to ask what we’re having for dinner, pales in comparison with a group of individuals who wish the destruction of the western world on a literally biblical level.

This exorcism of fear from the film narratives lead to the rise of SPECTRE and the various independent madmen who stalked the franchise. SPECTRE who only surfaced in three novels doubled to six film appearances and would have been more if not for the meddling of Kevin McClory. Dr. No morphed from soviet to SPECTRE agent, Goldfinger was a communist paymaster in the novel but went independent in the film as part of a conscious effort not to offend the Russians. The closest they ever came to coming up against the soviets directly was For Your Eyes Only, in which Bond battles Kristatos who is a Russian contractor who is actively working for the U.S.S.R. alongside an agent of that nation and plans to hand the decoding device at the center of the action over to General Gogol the head of the K.G.B.

As a result of EON’s desire to eschew Russian villainy and McClory’s meddling came the rise of the independent megalomaniac, the lone madman plotting world domination for his own benefit. Sometimes this worked other times not so much. For example The Spy Who Loved Me’s Stromberg and Moonraker’s Drax basically have the same plan to destroy civilization and reshape the world in their own image, only one wants to do it from the sea and the other space. The fact these two films were released back to back also doesn’t help. That’s not to say these films aren’t entertaining but they lack a creative edge and cinematic plausibility. Whereas I can accept organizations like SPECTRE and Kanaga’s “Mr. Big” organization finds legions of hapless flunkies to implement their various criminal schemes for fanatical gain, I find it harder to believe that Stromberg and Drax could recruit so many willing drones to wipe out all of humanity.

The other way they tackled this quandary was what I call the “Mad General Syndrome” in Octopussy, The Living Daylights and Goldeneye mad Russian generals hatched schemes to get rich or start a war for self-glorification. This results in giving the foe the full force and effect of national resources but yet depoliticizes the action.

Now that EON has the rights to the SPECTRE organization it will be interesting to see how they use it. They have a ready-made nemesis for Bond who they can utilize to avoid fear and politics as they have for fifty plus years, or they can just cock it all up, we shall see.

  7 comments for “Without Russia From Love

  1. Julien D.
    February 9, 2019 at 8:01 am

    I understand your critique of the independent megalomaniaic, but Stromberg and Drax were very memorable and iconic villains. Can you say the same for any of the post Moore era villains?

    • dirtybenny
      dirtybenny
      February 13, 2019 at 2:21 am

      Hello Julien,
      Thank you for taking the time to not only read my random musings but also to post! I am not discounting the characters of Drax and Stromberg who were very well written and expertly portrayed by the actors who brought them to life! I am taking exception and it’s only a very minor niggle with the fact their schemes are so similar compounded by the fact these two films were released back to back. If you are not a member of the forum already I would like to invite you to join where we can discuss the finer points of Bond in more detail. I also pre-post my rants there for open discussion.

  2. Vincenzo
    April 10, 2019 at 7:00 pm

    I found Jonathan Pryce rather entertaining, with the Uncle Rupert/ Cap’n Bob Maxwell comparisons, and he is often pretty funny in the role.
    Robert Carlyle did his best despite being physically somewhat unimposing (Renard might have worked better as a “hulking brute” figure) as did Sophie Marceau, but both had to contend with the creeping Purvis & Wade-itis and a director who often seemed to have nodded off at the wheel. I still liked the film though, unlike any later entrys in the series.
    Toby Stephens is an absolute hoot to watch if one is in the right mood (or a bit drunk obviously), although the film itself is undeniably a total and utter mess, which could have been so much better in more genuinely “creative” hands than those of Purvis/Wade/Tamahori/Auntie Barbara…

  3. dirtybenny
    dirtybenny
    April 12, 2019 at 8:56 pm

    Pryce does make for an entertaining villain and I would argue he’s the last of the true “Bond Villains.” Unfortunately as you point out a string of hacks began parading their way through the halls of EON tainting any creativity that survived with their fists of ham.

  4. Vincenzo
    June 6, 2019 at 9:49 pm

    I always thought it was a master stroke making SPECTRE the recurring villains while turning the Soviets from primary antagonists into the comic relief…

    “Russian clocks are ALWAYS correct”

    Imagine Vladimir Putin saying that…

    • dirtybenny
      dirtybenny
      June 6, 2019 at 11:33 pm

      ALWAYS!

      • Janna
        June 25, 2019 at 3:24 am

        Say what about using Boris Johnson, Teresa May Vladimir Putin as villains? I mean the real people mind you and they kill Craig? I would go see that.

Leave a Reply to Vincenzo Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *