And the whole concept that Daniel Craig is “the best Bond ever” is not only erroneous, but almost comical. Ignorance is bliss I presume. Maybe the mass (younger?) audience don’t even know what Bond is supposed to be. Don’t get me wrong, I am certainly encouraged that forty-ish balding craggy-faced guys can be action heroes. It makes my bid for such things much more likely, but Bond? Please.
— Garry
Great casting is picking actors the way Ian Fleming described them. Going against this is not clever it’s atrocious.
I find it difficult to believe G.Lazenby ranked last in your poll. He was Bond. Sir Sean 2nd. “OHMSS” best film. 2nd “DR.NO”. Best novel “Live And Let Die” (ruined as a film).
George Lazenby was not bad, Ohmss is great movie with lots of problems, in my view. Althoug Lazenby maybe did not fitted well in the biotype.