And the whole concept that Daniel Craig is “the best Bond ever” is not only erroneous, but almost comical. Ignorance is bliss I presume. Maybe the mass (younger?) audience don’t even know what Bond is supposed to be. Don’t get me wrong, I am certainly encouraged that forty-ish balding craggy-faced guys can be action heroes. It makes my bid for such things much more likely, but Bond? Please.
Great casting is picking actors the way Ian Fleming described them. Going against this is not clever it’s atrocious.
I find it difficult to believe G.Lazenby ranked last in your poll. He was Bond. Sir Sean 2nd. “OHMSS” best film. 2nd “DR.NO”. Best novel “Live And Let Die” (ruined as a film).
George Lazenby was not bad, Ohmss is great movie with lots of problems, in my view. Althoug Lazenby maybe did not fitted well in the biotype.