Conneryās Bond has been accused in the past of being a bit ārapeyā, most point to his seduction of Honor Blackmanās Pussy Galore in Goldfinger as the ultimate example. Letās take a look at that scene and compare it to another more contemporary love scene.
After Bond is found under Goldfingerās model, the nefarious bullion merchant asks his sultry aviatrix Miss Pussy Galore to āslip into something more suitableā in order to show Bond a good time, which in turn will convince Felix Leiter, who is watching with field glasses, that Bond needs no assistance.
Bond and Galore enter a barn where he tries to ascertain her true allegiances. She executes a judo throw which sends Bond flying, Bond responds by tripping her. After a few more judo holds and throws, Bond ends up suspending himself over Galore in a push-up like position. He begins to lower himself down to Pussy, she initially resists by pressing back on Bondās shoulders, as his lips reach hers, she relents and embraces him. Itās the no, no, no⦠yes, yes, yes trope that was popular at the time
Many take exception with this scene because Bond āforcesā himself on Pussy by using his body weight to overcome her āresistanceā to his sexual advance. We must remember, Pussy is complicit in a scheme which would kill over 50,000 innocent people in order for Goldfinger to detonate an atomic weapon. All so he can gain value on his glittery commodities. Iām not saying she deserves to be forced into any compromising positions, but considering the stakes at hand Bond trying to āappeal to her maternal instinctsā doesnāt seem quite so heinous. Not to mention, whoās to say Bond would have gone any farther had she not reciprocated.
Viewing this scene through the prism of modern values it certainly is āproblematicā as the kids say these days. However, this is the hyper fantasy world of 1960ās Bond, when the world as depicted in televisionās Mad Men was in full swing. I donāt bring this scene up to condone, legitimize or apologize for this behavior; I simply do so in order to juxtapose it against this other sceneā¦
In the dark, medieval days of 2015 we witness Craig in SPECTRE with the widow Sciarra played by Monica Bellucci. Craig hassles the widow at her husbandās funeral before following her home, where Craig guns down two executioners whoāve come to send Mrs. Sciarra to join her husband in the great beyond. After such romantic introductions Craig is shocked, positively shocked the woman is not in a passionate mood! In a fit of rage he slams down two glasses of champagne he was holding. Craig uses his imposing frame to force Mrs. Sciarra up against a mirror and begins heavily panting while he kisses on her while she literally sobs! Itās never sufficiently established why Craig even bothers with her. Yes we know heās looking for information, but why from her? Why is he molesting this woman when he could have and should have followed Waltzā Brofled after the funeral.
Hersās the difference between the scenes, in Goldfinger the āviolenceā between Bond and Pussy is playful and reciprocated. Pussy shows she is quite capable of taking care of herself and can physically handle Bond, to say nothing of the fact Goldfingerās compound is crawling with guards who would respond at a momentās notice were she to call out.
In Bellucciās case however, itās established sheās all alone, no oneās left to help her and the violence in the scene is harsh and jarring. When Craig slams the glasses to the floor they crash with a jolt to the audience. The scene is absolutely disturbing compared to the frisky one between Connery and Blackman. Add to this the tears rolling down Bellucciās cheeks as Craig undresses her and one canāt help but wonder what in the actual hell was going through the film makerās minds here?!
When push comes to shove it seems Connery’s Bond wasn’t any more “rapey” than the contemporary incarnation.
Sadly, this is Auntie Barbara’s way of making the character of Bond appear culturally repellant to the 21st century audience, whilst still happily making bucketloads of cash from it.
Any backlash from those genuinley offended by that particular scene gives the excuse to wreak more PC-motivated havoc upon the series.
Others can nod, sagely, stroke their chins and say “Well, thats the unhappy, unsympathetic anti-hero Fleming created” thus proving their lack of insight and understanding.
And that they never actually read any of the books…
Books!? Books!? What are these books you speak of!? Surely you are not inferring James Bond was based on any sort of literary source!!! Obviously Bond was created in a laboratory run by sexist, misogynist dinosaurs in an effort to create the most patriarchal villain known to science!