|
Shaken, but not stirred
Casino Royale is an exceedingly juvenile film - an unconvincing mish-mash of staples from the thriller genre (I mean, please, an oil tanker fight, a high speed car chase AND a poker game!) with a plot that has the consistency of Swiss cheese, duly seasoned with liberal dollops of mush. For most of the movie, its protagonist lives perilously on the edge of the ridiculous, and for all its tortured soul-searching the film has the emotional depth of a three day old puddle. It’s an almost complete waste of time, except for one not so minor detail - Daniel Craig.
|
|
Casino Royale review by Tiff
This movie did not live up to what I expected based on the critical and public reviews I had read. I think the producers attempted to take it from one genre (fantasy, tongue in cheek, action/spy movie) to another, (gritty, serious, action/spy movie) and left it somewhere in limbo.
|
|
|
|
007 è morto.
Here is a brilliantly poignant review from an Italian movie magazine called “Film”. The author of this review is a “huge Bond fan” and in his opinion “’Casino Royale’ is the worst Bond ever... if this crap IS a Bond film.”
|
|
|
|
FOR REAL BOND FANS!!! By floyd_dbmaxx007 A critical review of all the recent James Bond events and Casino Roayle by a tried and true, die hard James Bond fan.
|
|
|
|
Casino Royale: the new James Bond film. The relationship between Bond and Vesper is accorded a few minutes. While we are told they are mad for each other, little of the emotional or physical chemistry that would convince us makes its way to the screen. And Green and Craig are burdened, more or less out of the blue, with lines like this: “If the only thing left of you was your smile and your little finger, you’d still be more of a man than anyone I’ve ever met” and “I have no armour left. You’ve stripped it from me. Whatever is left of me—whatever I am—I’m yours.”
Aside from a few moments reclining with Vesper, Bond here is oddly machine-like, almost robotic. He moves rapidly, hurling himself from one point to the next. Connery’s Bond had some of the swaggering, almost lazy self-assurance of the Cold War “democracies”; Crag is nervous, unhappy, isolated. Some of this feels appropriate to the historical moment, but the psychological changes in the character have not been worked through; they seem to have evolved more or less arbitrarily and accidentally.
In the end, this is what makes a “realistic” Bond an oxymoron. Insofar as a Bond film comes into contact with social and historical facts, it must turn them on their head, losing any of its charm in the process.
Aside from a few entertaining and adventurous moments, and the lovely settings, there is very little to Casino Royale. And what there is, disturbs.
|
|
|
|
New James Bond Gadgets a Big Bore. The movie was OK. I'm pleased to see less-attractive guys in dramatic roles again; maybe we'll see the Humphrey Bogarts of the world getting more work.
As it is, though, I was sorely disappointed by the lack of Q, or anything sufficiently Q-ish, in the film. It's not that there were no gadgets, it's just that they were nearly all gadgets that actually exist and can be purchased, which is boring. I'm sure it makes for great product placement that all evil plots now involve text messaging, but I wouldn't call it great cinema.
|
|
|
|
Bond 2.1. Very early it becomes apparent that the reboot has been stripped down from what I had expected. I don't know if Craig's casting played a role in this but I would have to join that predictable naysayer chorus who feel that the actor looks a tad mature to be a wild young agent prone to mistakes and yet to discover his favourite alcoholic tipple.
|
|
|
|
Daniel Craig? Not Bond, James Bond. He’s Blond, James Blond. He’s a counter-spy, an impostor, a pretender, a double-agent. The aura doesn’t match that of the real McCoy.
|
|
|
|
Superspy Vs. Spheniscidae:This Year's Bond and Dancing Penguin go toe-to-toe. -- I know everybody’s gushing about it right now, but once the adrenaline subsides (two weeks, tops), most will see that it is obscenely underwritten, with nary a memorable line to be found.
|
|
|
|
Cartoon Bond loses his humanity.This one stars Daniel Craig as the new Bond, a blond-haired, blue-eyed dude who looks like he should be skiing the giant slalom for Sweden in the next Winter Olympics.
That's bad enough, if you're a traditional 007 fan like me. What's worse is that the producers have done the unthinkable: they've turned James Bond into a virtual Superman. All he's missing is the blue and red costume with the big S on the chest.
|
|
|
|
The spy who gagged me. Craig is to Connery what Mini-Me is to Austin Powers' Dr. Evil.
|
|
|
|
From a woman's perspective he is neither sexy nor charming. This is definitely what one would call a "guy film" and a " 35 year-old going on 13 year-old guy who lives in his mother's basement film" at that.
|
|
|
|
Gossip Monkey: So, my verdict on this movie is simply this: Bourne-Lite.
|
|
|
|
The 'Royale' treatment: who wants to see Bond learn a lesson about ego, as if he were Greg Brady in his "Johnny Bravo" phase?
|
|
|
|
Let's All Go to the Movies. In all seriousness, we don't want our Bonds angsty and broody and dark. We want our Bonds making bad jokes and sleeping with tons of hot women and having no problem with violence. What made Sean Connery so badass was because he was the only Bond really to actually look like he was enjoying himself. And if you were James Bond, how could you not be enjoying yourself?
|
|
|
|
Bond flick leaves viewer shaken, not stirred. Beyond a new lead actor, this "Bond" is different, and that mostly isn't good.
|
|
|
|
Casino Royale is a Bond film for people who think James Bond films are by and large shite.
|
|
|
|
..the producers didn't show sufficient respect for the formula.
|
|
|
|
Okay, I was willing to reserve judgment until I saw the film, but now it's official ---- I don't like a blonde Bond!
|
|
|
|
The V Calls Casino Royale's Bluff: This year, it is Casino Royale, surprise heir to the throne of Worst Bond Film Ever. ..this isn’t the film he was promised. This is James Bond as directed by a house-wife, with her 12 year-old son directing the action. Uninspired, unsuccessful and as much of a franchise-killing blow as this critic has witnessed.
|
|
|
|
Casino Royale, most disappointing Bond film ever.
|
|
|
|
A brutish, buff Bond
|
|
|
|
I was looking forward to see this film but the story sure didn’t hold up.
|
|
|
|
New Bond Blunted Casino Royale, retains most of Bond's essence and practically none of his charms
|
|
|
|
New Bond and Casino Royale' don't give audience license to care. This is where I'm supposed to say, "Bond is back and he's better than ever!" Well, he is. But he isn't.
|
|
|
|
Gut Reaction: Casino Royale
|
|
|
|
Um, Is That You, Bond? It's a nice try, throwing romance into the stew, but after all its expert exertions, Casino Royale can't rev up the melancholy mood. Which is appropriate, for this is a Bond with great body but no soul.
|
|
|
|
Filmmakers roll the dice with new 007 in Casino Royale.
|
|
|
|
Why Mr Bond, we've been expecting you.
|
|
|
|
The New James Bond: 00-Creepy?
|
|
|
|
DailyRecord.co.uk: I Spy A Really Bad Ending
|
|
|
|
The Sunday Times: “And you almost feel a kind of patriotic duty to go out and see it. Don’t bother. James Bond is dead..”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debbie Schlussel: I've Seen Casino Royale & DANIEL CRAIG SUCKS This new dude, Daniel Craig, just doesn't cut it. He's DULL. No charisma, no charm, no suavity and debonaireness. Too old and haggard looking. And he's way too thin (scrawny) and small (hair's too short and ears stick out, too--like Alfred E. Neuman). Very blah. Not sexy. Nice eyes, but nothing behind them. Would Sir Ian Fleming fancy this guy playing Bond? Doubtful."
|
|
|
|
Parisian film critic Mathieu Carratier on Casino Royale: "..in trying to distance itself from its pedigree, ends up with no pedigree at all."
|
|
|
|
"And Daniel Craig isn't Bond. He's Jason Bourne in five years."
|
|
|
|
Gossip Monkey about Casino Royale: -There’ s been various reviews already, though most are bias.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You might be shaken, but this Bond won't leave you stirred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino Royale: Good action, but a Bond Misfire.
|
|
|